Pragmatics of Impoliteness and Rudeness
Hiba Nassrullah Mohammed, Nawal Fadhil Abbas
Abstract
There is a great deal of overlap between the two concepts of impoliteness and rudeness. Despite the fact that both
refer to the offensive behavior, there is a main difference between the two terms. This paper is devoted to reveal
that difference, which is a matter of intentionality, clarifying which one of them is intentional and which is not.
Besides, it is intended to examine these two pragmatic concepts in a specific extract chosen carefully from George
Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion (1913) by applying Culpeper’s (2005) model of impoliteness especially his types of
impoliteness ‘affective impoliteness, coercive impoliteness and entertaining impoliteness’, on one hand, and
Segarra’s (2007) classification of rudeness types including: rudeness of word, rudeness of action and inaction
rudeness, on the other hand. Therefore, the researchers will provide an adequate account of impoliteness and
rudeness as spic-and-span linguistic phenomena highlighting their meanings, definitions and types, as well as the
difference between them. Taking into account the fact that understanding politeness is indispensible to
comprehend impoliteness, the researchers of this study will also explicate politeness with its prominent theory
‘Brown and Levinson's (1987) face-saving theory’.
Full Text: PDF